Latest Case Summary Articles

Boulus Constructions Pty Ltd v Warrumbungle Shire Council (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1368 highlights the importance of understanding your legal rights as a homeowner and the responsibilities of your builder. The case involved a dispute between the builder and council over breach of contract and for misleading and deceptive conduct and defective works. This article provides an overview of the case, relevant laws and regulations, and steps homeowners can take to protect their legal rights and ensure their builder meets contractual obligations.

In Martignago v Visual Building Construction Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATCD 219, the NCAT considered a case of defective residential building work. This article provides a detailed case analysis and its significance for homeowners and builders in NSW, highlighting the importance of understanding the Home Building Act 1989, identifying defective work, seeking expert evidence, and the available remedies under the Act.

The case of Owners SP v Binah Constructions PL offers insight into building disputes in Sydney, Australia. This article analyses the case’s background, legal issues, and implications for homeowners. By understanding these legal principles, homeowners can navigate building disputes and seek remedies for defects or disputes with builders.

The case of Tzaneros Investments Pty Ltd v Walker Group Constructions Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 1171 is a significant case in the field of construction law in New South Wales, Australia. The case involved a dispute between a property owner, Tzaneros Investments Pty Ltd, and a builder, Walker Group Constructions Pty Ltd, over defective construction work and unpaid invoices.

Boulus Constructions Pty Ltd v Warrumbungle Shire Council (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1368 highlights the importance of understanding your legal rights as a homeowner and the responsibilities of your builder. The case involved a dispute between the builder and council over breach of contract and for misleading and deceptive conduct and defective works. This article provides an overview of the case, relevant laws and regulations, and steps homeowners can take to protect their legal rights and ensure their builder meets contractual obligations.

Solar panels are a popular way for homeowners to reduce their carbon footprint and save on energy costs. However, the rise in demand has led to an increase in untrustworthy solar panel installation companies engaging in deceptive practices. We’ll analyse the Bell Solar Pty Limited T/as Sunboost v Anderson [2021] NSWCATAP 278 case to provide homeowners with insights when considering solar panels.

The case of Bajimaya v. Reward Homes Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATAP 297 emphasises the need for homeowners to understand their rights during the construction process. Building a dream home requires significant investments of time and money, and legal protection is essential to safeguard this investment. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the case, covering the legal issues, court decisions, and lessons that homeowners can learn from it

In this case, the High Court of Australia considered the proper measure of damages for defective work in construction contracts. This article provides a case summary, including the main issues, the respondent’s claim, the appellant’s defence, and what the respondent was entitled to. It also examines the measure of damages for a breach of a building contract, and possible legal implications of the case for contract law, tort law, property law, construction law, and professional negligence.

The construction industry in Australia has its fair share of disputes between contractors and homeowners. When can homeowners claim damages for defective work? The Brewarrina Shire Council v Beckhaus Civil Pty Ltd & 1 Or [2005] NSWCA 248 case provides valuable guidance. This article will analyse the case and its implications for homeowners seeking to claim damages for defective work.